I am amazed at how many ways progressives say they protect women, but when you look at the data, the data says they hate women.
I will deal with the current worst reason last.
First, women who are not married live a life much closer to poverty levels. And if she has children, she is probably in poverty.
If you want women out of poverty, you want women to become empowered by traditional marriage.
Second, continuing with this problem, single women are coerced into depending upon the Government instead of their families for support and the hope of moving out of poverty.
If you hate women, you want them on government support and in poverty.
Thirdly, by destroying the traditional family, there is a sick side effect. Women lose hope. As strange as it is. Women hope through their husbands and their children. By destroying that tradition; by attacking family and men; by teaching women they should hope in their government; women are taught that their natural wiring is wrong. So, they spend their lives trying to fix their wiring; their natural instincts; their true desires. They try to replace their natural desires with un-natural desires.
And we wonder why so many women in the USA are terribly depressed?
Lastly, Progressives want women to be raped. In a strange twist of logic, the writer of this hate piece wrote protecting women from being victimized a first and then a third time. The first way a woman is victimized because of rape is by protecting herself.
Okay, that is crazy.
But, after letting the woman become a rape victim, the writer declared that by protecting some women from being raped, you would victimize the raped women, because those women would feel guilty for not protecting themselves.
Did you get that?
More women should become rape victims so that those who are raped do not feel guilty.
I would attack that in more detail, but it is such a disgusting reasoning, I will let it speak for itself.
Does the progressive hate make you as sick as it makes me?